Dell’"imminente" ripubblicizzazione of the corporation Aqueduct Pugliese spoken since February. On February 4, was adopted by the Regional Council (now the expiry of the mandate), the bill no 7 for the establishment of the regional public "Apulian Aqueduct - AQP (still downloadable on the website of the Regional Council of Apulia) is characterized by many significant points. Article. 2 states that the integrated water service Puglia "is considered a public service of local interest, pursuant to art. 1, paragraph 3 of this law, so irrelevant and removed from the rule of economic competition" and states that the they are entrusted "solely for a public regional grado di garantire la gestione dell’intero ciclo con criteri di efficacia, efficienza, trasparenza, equità sociale, solidarietà, senza finalità lucrativa e nel rispetto dei diritti delle generazioni future e degli equilibri ecologici".
L'art. 5 del DDL prevede invece la costituzione dell’azienda pubblica regionale AQP, non avente finalità di lucro e subentrante nelle attività e in tutti i rapporti attivi e passivi alla società Acquedotto Pugliese Spa (che dunque sarebbe diventata un ricordo).
Eppure questo DDL è una seconda versione di un'altra bozza, risalente a un anno prima, in origine contenente anch’essa la dicitura "azienda pubblica regionale, entity of public law. "This draft, the work of a technical Vendola equally between government and various movements and groups, was approved by the junta by December 31, 2009 and then moved into the regional council, as to become law. But the junta in that case had changed the design by deleting the words "subject to public law" and leaving only "regional public company, already raising protests from members of the Water Common Good, by definition committed to moving on the water front public.
Just in time for election campaign (and we're back to February 4) the Board approves the DDL 7 reintroducing the definition "Subject to public law" (essential, because a corporation is not really a public juridical person, even if wholly owned by the regions of Puglia and Basilicata as in the case, but may become withdrawn only if the laws of private law). Now, however, the term is winding down and no time to present it to Council, where the majority can vote for the conversion into regional law. But in fact we are in the campaign: February 5, and so already spread the news (taken from the web site press the Puglia Region) approval of the bill by the junta, also reported on some sites, Environment and Freedom Left . The principle public water supply, in addition to the common good water, has not yet become law, but the junta's ok (executive), crippled the vote in the Council (legislative), is almost passed for final approval.
But it is a statement of the same Vendola proof that "everything has to be redone" in March, the outgoing governor ripubblicizzare takes the commitment of the aqueduct in the first hundred days of term if reelected. Too bad that this is not (yet another) promise to camp on the posters in the streets, but the rhyme ambiguous "Hands off the pitcher, the water is ours do not touch!" Of creativi delle “fabbriche”. Certo, il sottotitolo parla di tutt’altro (“ridotte del 20% le perdite dell’Acquedotto”), ma tutto fa brodo e per tanti vendoliani icono-videodipendenti, che ingaggiano quotidianamente le battaglie di commenti online, “con Nichi l’acqua è diventata pubblica”. Del resto in quel periodo riscuote successi il Comitato per l’acqua, che sta per approntare una raccolta firme per un referendum (contro alcune norme del governo sulla privatizzazione dell’acqua); allora si mette in moto la giostra della propaganda di SeL e del centrosinistra, volta a conquistare voti col pretesto di aiutare il comitato; in alcuni servizi del Tg3 nazionale si è persino spoke of the initiative referendum in combination with the placet of the same Vendola and pictures of the banquet managers SEL signatures, obscuring the most of the Committee (as such a body plural).
Vendola After re-election in late March, a new storm of declarations and proclamations. E 'April 25 statement of the Regional Public Works Fabiano Amati, petitioner, inter alia, for the Referendum Committee: "The Regional Council has already approved the bill on the table prepared by the Apulian Aqueduct ripubblicizzazione Joint Technical "and" once the Council s'insedierà fight with all the forces to approve it immediately. "
another month, another "approval". On 11 May, the junta re-approve "a bill aimed at regulating the government and management of integrated water services through the establishment of the regional public" as stated in yet another news the next day. It is also made explicit reference to the future again face of AQP (from Spa owned by the public to fully public company, with a lot of buying shares from Basilicata).
But history, according to a recent article from "Liberation" (PRC newspaper, a member of the majority party in region) ends on July 21 when the DDL "is sent to committees competent. [...]. Time passes and have yet to scheduling hearings. The goal of 100 days seems blurred. At best, the matter postponed to December. " Meanwhile, the firm scales territorial unit in Brindisi and Trani, with 170 workers at risk.
In short, we were bombarded by a series of triumphant announcements of "approval" double and triple in the press that after months doing their terrible figure on the internet ... confusing waters. But if you wanted to find real provisions in regional legislation, scanning an archive of bulletins posted in early 2010 to now on the website of BURP Puglia (and yours truly did) you will be disappointed. Not even the shadow of the long-awaited law, and still appears the word "aqueduct Pugliese Spa" or "AQP Spa" in the texts of other acts relating all'Aqp. Who made the grand gesture to hunt Petrella in 2006 by senior management, do not expect more.
Furthermore (and still include "Deliverance") the water committees dare bother the poet writes to defend workers and the choices of the local units of Monteforte. These were the precise words of Vendola: "I do not respond to the letter of Committee Water common good. I can only say that we are not in the Soviet Union. " A total of accession and scandalous trial incondizionata ai desideri ultraliberisti imposti dai grandi poteri economici a danno della collettività, dello spregio derisorio e spavaldo verso ogni coerenza ideologica e verso i “poveri fessi” che credono ancora ai colori delle bandiere. Il capitalismo (al di là delle chiacchiere “filoprecarie” à-la “Ballarò” o “Parla con me”) ringrazia Nichi, l’americano, che anche sull’acqua ha potuto conservare il suo scranno e cominciare la scalata alla leadership della sinistra ammucchiata antiberlusconiana.
Riferimenti:
- Il DDL n° 7 (February 4, 2010): www.consiglio.puglia.it / applications / cadan / classroom / public / VIII / legislativi.asp (click on the number 390 to download)
- I first "ad" (February 5, 2010): www.sinistraelibertacapitanata.it/2010/02/05/governo-vendola-giunta-approva-legge-su-acqua-bene-comune (with link below the press-region)
- The promise of a hundred days (March 2010): http://corrieredelmezzogiorno.corriere.it/bari/notizie/economia/2010/23-marzo-2010/ Revolution-aqueduct-pugliesela-spa-gate-100-days - 1602703163813.shtml
- Other "approval" (May 12, 2010): www.barilive.it/news/news.aspx?idnews=17260
Andrea Russo
